I have been a fan of yours for awhile, Matt Walsh; a big fan. Before becoming a full-time stay at home parent I was a health educator in the public schools. I wish I thought your perceptions of comprehensive sex education were accurate, but I respectfully do not. I would like to believe that parents who are incapable of teaching their children healthy, universal lessons about human sexuality are an “aberration,” but research shows we have not yet evolved to that level of competence as a society. Since your arguments are not actually based in research or evidence, allow me to speak from the heart as you do. In my experience, and I know that you are speaking from your experience, I believe comprehensive sex education in schools saves/improves/protects lives. This is what I have witnessed: 1) Human sexuality is a part of biological science, which is taught in schools. We do not restrict information about other sciences based upon the cultural beliefs of students. We give them the facts. 2) What we teach in schools does not restrict what parents can teach kids at home. If they are capable, loving parents, lessons from home will be primary, not secondary, to lessons learned at school. 3) You suggest we have a case of parentphobia. Please consider whether you have a case of teacherphobia. Health educators are professionals, and “most of them are…capable. Most [teachers] love their [students]. Most [teachers] would do anything for their [students]. Most [teachers] know what’s best for their [classrooms].” Teachers aren’t the government…I encourage you to have a little faith in them. In fact, perhaps you still have some things to learn from teachers that will help you navigate the parenting “minefield” of which you speak. Sometimes we need expert guidance from people who are trained professionals. 4) One of our biggest failures as a society is our tendency to trust our assertion that “I can look around me” and see everything that’s going on out there. We need to doubt our beliefs about “most of us” because that is usually biased by what we see. When we make decisions about the needs of our society as a whole, we have to remember, respectfully, that “most of us” don’t interact daily with a representative sample of the population. Matt, we need to doubt ourselves every time we use the phrase “most of us.” Herein lies the intended and constructive purpose of statistics; science and research that can help us make decisions about what kids as a population need. “Most” researchers are good, smart people that have the very best for young people at heart. As parents, we cringe at the idea of our kids rendered to numbers, but these numbers have the ability to remove our blinders when all we can see is what is around us. The evidence, in this case, suggests that comprehensive sex education in schools has reduced the rate of unintended pregnancy, teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. As a health educator, I can tell you that everyday I had that job, I went home feeling like I improved the outcome of someone’s life that day. As a citizen, when I send my kids to public school I choose to be willing to have my children educated in such a way that is best for the common good. And as a parent, I welcome the challenge to teach my kids what I want them to know about their sexuality in the context of what they learn in school, on the playground, and in conversation with other kids and adults. I encourage you to broaden your view, doubt your assertions, and then tell us all what you think is best for our children. Here are some resources:
6) In general, The Search Institute‘s perspective on what “kids need to succeed”
7) Let’s have a conversation; I am absolutely open to your response.